supercross Dallas 450 HD
Posted at 2012-03-14 22:10:54
Air America was built around ivahng hosts with name recognition, but who had never done much, if any radio, & could not entertain while informing. Franken & Garofalo are just 2 examples of this. They were unable to build an audience because they don't understand radio. When you look at conservative talk radio, you see guys like El=Rushbo, Hannity, & Beck. They all had extensive radio backrounds before the nation ever heard of them. Because of that, they understand how to build a following & keep it.
Posted at 2012-03-14 22:10:51
Air America was built around ivahng hosts with name recognition, but who had never done much, if any radio, & could not entertain while informing. Franken & Garofalo are just 2 examples of this. They were unable to build an audience because they don't understand radio. When you look at conservative talk radio, you see guys like El=Rushbo, Hannity, & Beck. They all had extensive radio backrounds before the nation ever heard of them. Because of that, they understand how to build a following & keep it.
Posted at 2012-03-14 21:15:58
Amazing, hash, just amazing.To eibelve your view of things regarding the failure of AAR, we have to eibelve the following:1) A man who is syndicated on 500+ stations nationwide is so afraid of the magickal power of one woman (Rhodes) that he will start a conspiracy in order to bring down an entire network in order to sabotage her future career. At the same time his company, Premier Radio Networks, sponsors any number of different talkers, most with a right bent and some of which are in direct competition in various markets, but he's okay with that.2) The new management of AAR, whose political leanings and contributions have been demonstrated by hard evidence to be entirely left-leaning is, secretly, sympathetic to the neo-con agenda; thus, they have taken over AAR in order to sabotage it.3) The talents at AAR are 'leaders in their field' and yet have come from relative obscurity until crashing on the scene at AAR - and then becoming spectacular ratings failures because of the interference cited in item #2 above, even though those people cited in item #2 above did not arrive on the AAR scene until four months ago, but were still able to carry out the neo-con sabotage anyway.4) People are now being scared away from advertising on radio shows because they don't want to suffer the same fate as befell AAR.I would offer a one-step alternate hypothesis:1) AAR flopped because the people there did not understand what made talk radio successful, and thus were not able to consistent ratings which can then be sold to advertisers who, by the hashman's own words, "just want the listeners to hear their ads."Anyone want to apply Occam's Razor to that one?
Posted at 2012-03-14 21:15:57
Amazing, hash, just amazing.To eibelve your view of things regarding the failure of AAR, we have to eibelve the following:1) A man who is syndicated on 500+ stations nationwide is so afraid of the magickal power of one woman (Rhodes) that he will start a conspiracy in order to bring down an entire network in order to sabotage her future career. At the same time his company, Premier Radio Networks, sponsors any number of different talkers, most with a right bent and some of which are in direct competition in various markets, but he's okay with that.2) The new management of AAR, whose political leanings and contributions have been demonstrated by hard evidence to be entirely left-leaning is, secretly, sympathetic to the neo-con agenda; thus, they have taken over AAR in order to sabotage it.3) The talents at AAR are 'leaders in their field' and yet have come from relative obscurity until crashing on the scene at AAR - and then becoming spectacular ratings failures because of the interference cited in item #2 above, even though those people cited in item #2 above did not arrive on the AAR scene until four months ago, but were still able to carry out the neo-con sabotage anyway.4) People are now being scared away from advertising on radio shows because they don't want to suffer the same fate as befell AAR.I would offer a one-step alternate hypothesis:1) AAR flopped because the people there did not understand what made talk radio successful, and thus were not able to consistent ratings which can then be sold to advertisers who, by the hashman's own words, "just want the listeners to hear their ads."Anyone want to apply Occam's Razor to that one?
Posted at 2012-03-14 21:15:56
Amazing, hash, just amazing.To eibelve your view of things regarding the failure of AAR, we have to eibelve the following:1) A man who is syndicated on 500+ stations nationwide is so afraid of the magickal power of one woman (Rhodes) that he will start a conspiracy in order to bring down an entire network in order to sabotage her future career. At the same time his company, Premier Radio Networks, sponsors any number of different talkers, most with a right bent and some of which are in direct competition in various markets, but he's okay with that.2) The new management of AAR, whose political leanings and contributions have been demonstrated by hard evidence to be entirely left-leaning is, secretly, sympathetic to the neo-con agenda; thus, they have taken over AAR in order to sabotage it.3) The talents at AAR are 'leaders in their field' and yet have come from relative obscurity until crashing on the scene at AAR - and then becoming spectacular ratings failures because of the interference cited in item #2 above, even though those people cited in item #2 above did not arrive on the AAR scene until four months ago, but were still able to carry out the neo-con sabotage anyway.4) People are now being scared away from advertising on radio shows because they don't want to suffer the same fate as befell AAR.I would offer a one-step alternate hypothesis:1) AAR flopped because the people there did not understand what made talk radio successful, and thus were not able to consistent ratings which can then be sold to advertisers who, by the hashman's own words, "just want the listeners to hear their ads."Anyone want to apply Occam's Razor to that one?
210
Posted at 2012-02-19 11:53:12
wow.que carrera..siento lo de chad reed...buenas carrera
Rafael
Posted at 2012-03-14 22:10:55
Air America was built around ivahng hosts with name recognition, but who had never done much, if any radio, & could not entertain while informing. Franken & Garofalo are just 2 examples of this. They were unable to build an audience because they don't understand radio. When you look at conservative talk radio, you see guys like El=Rushbo, Hannity, & Beck. They all had extensive radio backrounds before the nation ever heard of them. Because of that, they understand how to build a following & keep it.
Reply to comment